|
Post by Gerald on Aug 20, 2006 15:54:51 GMT -5
If any team makes an uneven trade like a 2 for 1 or 3 for 1 or something like that. The team that gets the majority of the players needs to drop players in order to keep there roster at 16. The trade will not go through until that happens. Thank You.
|
|
|
Post by The Chicken on Aug 20, 2006 16:09:26 GMT -5
your ruling is quoted as such:
"*If you make a trade that puts you over the roster limit, you must put your team at the roster limit immediatly or the trade will not go through.
so if a team wants to back out of a trade it made involving multiple players it can simply not adjust their roster size thus making the trade null and void.
|
|
|
Post by Gerald on Aug 20, 2006 16:34:12 GMT -5
your ruling is quoted as such: "*If you make a trade that puts you over the roster limit, you must put your team at the roster limit immediatly or the trade will not go through. so if a team wants to back out of a trade it made involving multiple players it can simply not adjust their roster size thus making the trade null and void. Sure, however you want to take it. The basics, if a trade puts you over the roster limit, you must drop a player or players to put you at the roster requirement of 16. Is anybody else having difficulties with the rules? Please let me know now before the season starts. Thank You.
|
|
|
Post by Thunderstruck on Aug 20, 2006 18:48:02 GMT -5
I would like to put an idea out there. I think that on all trades the league should vote on them. I think that there should be a 24 hr. time limit to vote and pass or veto the trades. What do you all think?
|
|
|
Post by Pepsi QC on Aug 20, 2006 20:25:33 GMT -5
I am all for voting on trades. In case anyone is interested, I am in a couple leagues now that vote on trades. In each league, 7 votes is needed to yeah or nay a trade. But you have to watch owners who just veto everything.
|
|
|
Post by The Chicken on Aug 21, 2006 0:40:01 GMT -5
i dont think this will work - too many ppl will veto trades cuz they now have the power to do so but if we do implement this rule then I VETO my trade with Gerald involving Jerry Porter
|
|
|
Post by Thunderstruck on Aug 21, 2006 11:47:07 GMT -5
I dont think that in this league we would have that problem. As long as the trades are fair I dont think that any owner will just veto every trade. Would you get over Jerry Porter?
|
|